Table of Contents
- 1. Batch Updates
- 2. Why JPA and Hibernate matter
- 3. Why jOOQ matters
JDBC 2.0 introduced batch updates so that multiple DML statements can be grouped into a single database request.
Sending multiple statements in a single request reduces the number of database roundtrips, therefore decreasing transaction response time.
Even if the reference specification uses the term updates, any insert, update or delete statement can be batched, and
JDBC supports batching for
Not only each database driver is distinct, but even different versions of the same driver might require implementation-specific configurations.
For executing static SQL statements, JDBC defines the
Statement interface, which comes with a batching API as well.
Other than for test sake, using a
Statement for CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete), as in the example below, should be avoided for it’s prone to SQL injection attacks.
The numbers of database rows affected by each statement is included in the return value of the
The following graph depicts how different JDBC drivers behave when varying batch size, the test measuring the time it takes to insert 1000 post rows with 4 comments each:
Reordering inserts, so that all posts are inserted before the comment rows, gives the following results:
Reordering statements does not seem to improve performance noticeably, although some drivers (e.g. MySQL) might take advantage of this optimization.
The following graph demonstrates how statement rewriting performs against the default behavior of the MySQL JDBC driver:
Rewriting non-parameterized statements seems to make a difference, as long as the batch size is not too large. In practice, it is common to use a relatively small batch size, to reduce both the client-side memory footprint and to avoid congesting the server from suddenly processing a huge batch load.
For parameterized statements (a very common enterprise application requirement), the JDBC
Statement is a poor fit because the only option for varying the executing SQL statement is through
String template or concatenating
String tokens is risky as it makes the data access logic vulnerable to SQL injection attacks.
To address this shortcoming, JDBC offers the
PreparedStatement interface for binding parameters in a safe manner.
The driver must validate the provided parameter at runtime, therefore discarding unexpected input values.
PreparedStatement is associated with a single DML statement, the batch update can group multiple parameter values belonging to the same prepared statement.
All DML statements can benefit from batching as the following tests demonstrate. Just like for the JDBC
Statement test case,
the same amount of data (1000 post and 4000 comments) is inserted, updated, and deleted while varying the batch size.
All database systems show a significant performance improvement when batching prepared statements. Some database systems are very fast when inserting or updating rows while others perform very well when deleting data.
Compared to the previous
Statement batch insert results, it is clear that, for the same data load, the
PreparedStatement use case performs just better.
Statement(s) should not be used for batching CRUD operations, being more suitable for bulk processing:
Finding the right batch size is not a trivial thing to do as there is no mathematical equation to solve the appropriate batch size for any enterprise application.
Like any other performance optimization technique, measuring the application performance gain in response to a certain batch size value remains the most reliable tuning option.
The astute reader has already figured out that even a low batch size can reduce the transaction response time, and the performance gain does not grow linearly with batch size. Although a larger batch value can save more database roundtrips, the overall performance gain does not necessarily increase linearly. In fact, a very large batch size can hurt application performance if the transaction takes too long to be executed.
As a rule of thumb, you should always measure the performance improvement for various batch sizes. In practice, a relatively low value (between 10 and 30) is usually a good choice.
Apart from batching, SQL offers bulk operations to modify all rows that satisfy a given filtering criteria. Bulk update or delete statements can also benefit from indexing, just like select statements.
To update all records from the previous example, one would have to execute the following statements:
|DB_A time (ms)||DB_B time (ms)||DB_C time (ms)||DB_D time (ms)|
The bulk alternative is one order of magnitude faster than batch updates. However, batch updates can benefit from application-level optimistic locking mechanisms, which are suitable for preventing lost updates when data is loaded in a read-only database transaction and written back in a successive transaction.
Like with updates, bulk deleting is also much faster than deleting in batches.
|DB_A time (ms)||DB_B time (ms)||DB_C time (ms)||DB_D time (ms)|
It is common practice to delegate the row identifier generation to the database system. This way, the developer does not have to provide a monotonically incrementing primary key since the database takes care of this upon inserting a new record.
As convenient as this practice may be, it is important to know that auto-generated database identifiers might conflict with the batch insert process.
Like many other database features, setting the auto incremented identifier strategy is database-specific so the choice goes between an identity column or a database sequence generator.
Many database developers like this approach since the client does not have to care about supplying a database identifier upon inserting a new row.
To retrieve the newly created row identifier, the JDBC
PreparedStatement must be instructed to return the auto-generated keys.
One alternative is to hint the driver about the column index holding the auto-generated key column.
The column name can also be used to instruct the driver about the auto-generated key column.
It is better to know all these three alternatives because they are not interchangeable on all database systems.
According to the JDBC 4.2 specification, every driver must implement the
supportsGetGeneratedKeys() method and specify whether it supports auto-generated key retrieval.
Unfortunately, this only applies to single statement updates as the specification does not make it mandatory for drivers to support generated key retrieval for batch statements.
That being said, not all database systems support fetching auto-generated keys from a batch of statements.
|Returns generated keys after calling||Oracle JDBC driver (220.127.116.11)||Oracle JDBC driver (18.104.22.168)||SQL Server JDBC driver (4.2)||PostgreSQL JDBC driver (9.4-1201-jdbc41)||MySQL JDBC driver (5.1.36)|
If the Oracle JDBC driver 22.214.171.124 cannot retrieve auto-generated batch keys, the 126.96.36.199 version works just fine. When trying to get the auto-generated batch keys, the SQL Server JDBC driver throws this exception: The statement must be executed before any results can be obtained.
As opposed to identity columns, database sequences offer the advantage of decoupling the identifier generation from the actual row insert. To make use of batch inserts, the identifier must be fetched prior to setting the insert statement parameter values.
For calling a sequence, every database offers a specific syntax:
Because the primary key is generated up-front, there is no need to call the
getGeneratedKeys() method, and so batch inserts are not driver dependent anymore.
Many database engines use sequence number generation optimizations to lower the sequence call execution as much as possible. If the number of inserted records is relatively low, then the sequence call overhead (extra database roundtrips) will be insignificant. However, for batch processors inserting large amounts of data, the extra sequence calls can add up.
Although JDBC does a very good job of exposing a common API that hides the database vendor-specific communication protocol, it suffers from the following shortcomings:
- The API is undoubtedly verbose, even for trivial tasks.
- Batching is not transparent from the data access layer perspective, requiring a specific API than its non-batched statement counterpart.
- Lack of built-in support for explicit locking and optimistic concurrency control.
- For local transactions, the data access is tangled with transaction management semantics.
- Fetching joined relations requires additional processing to transform the
ResultSetinto Domain Models or DTO (Data Transfer Object) graphs.
Although the primary goal of an ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) tool is to automatically translate object state transitions into SQL statements, this chapter aims to demonstrate that Hibernate can address all the aforementioned JDBC shortcomings.
When a relational database is manipulated through an object-oriented program, the two different data representations start conflicting.
In a relational database, data is stored in tables, and the relational algebra defines how data associations are formed. On the other hand, an object-oriented programming (OOP) language allows objects to have both state and behavior, and bidirectional associations are permitted.
The burden of converging these two distinct approaches has generated much tension, and it has been haunting enterprise systems for a very long time.
The above diagram portrays the two different schemas that the data access layer needs to correlate. While the database schema is driven by the SQL standard specification, the Domain Model comes with an object-oriented schema representation as well.
The Domain Model encapsulates the business logic specifications and captures both data structures and the behavior that governs business requirements. OOP facilitates Domain Modeling, and many modern enterprise systems are implemented on top of an object-oriented programming language.
Because the underlying data resides in a relational database, the Domain Model must be adapted to the database schema and the SQL-driven communication protocol. The ORM design pattern helps to bridge these two different data representations and close the technological gap between them. Every database row is associated with a Domain Model object (Entity in JPA terminology), and so the ORM tool can translate the entity state transitions into DML statements.
From an application development point of view, this is very convenient since it is much easier to manipulate Domain Model relationships rather than visualizing the business logic through its underlying SQL statements.
JPA is only a specification. It describes the interfaces that the client operates with and the standard object-relational mapping metadata (Java annotations or XML descriptors). Beyond the API definition, JPA also explains (although not exhaustively) how these specifications are ought to be implemented by the JPA providers. JPA evolves with the Java EE platform itself (Java EE 6 featuring JPA 2.0 and Java EE 7 introducing JPA 2.1).
Hibernate was already a full-featured Java ORM implementation by the time the JPA specification was released for the first time. Although it implements the JPA specification, Hibernate retains its native API for both backward compatibility and to accommodate non-standard features.
Even if it is best to adhere to the JPA standard, in reality, many JPA providers offer additional features targeting a high-performance data access layer requirements. For this purpose, Hibernate comes with the following non-JPA compliant features:
- extended identifier generators (hi/lo, pooled, pooled-lo)
- transparent prepared statement batching
- customizable CRUD (
- static/dynamic entity/collection filters (e.g.
- mapping attributes to SQL fragments (e.g.
- immutable entities (e.g.
- more flush modes (e.g.
- querying the second-level cache by the natural key of a given entity
- entity-level cache concurrency strategies
Cache(usage = CacheConcurrencyStrategy.READ_WRITE))
- versioned bulk updates through HQL
- exclude fields from optimistic locking check (e.g.
@OptimisticLock(excluded = true))
- versionless optimistic locking (e.g.
- support for skipping (without waiting) pessimistic lock requests
- support for Java 8 Date and Time and
- support for multitenancy
The JPA implementation details leak and ignoring them might hinder application performance or even lead to data inconsistency issues. As an example, the following JPA attributes have a peculiar behavior, which can surprise someone who is familiar with the JPA specification only:
- The FlushModeType.AUTO does not trigger a flush for native SQL queries like it does for JPQL or Criteria API.
- The FetchType.EAGER might choose a SQL join or a secondary select whether the entity is fetched directly from the
EntityManageror through a JPQL (Java Persistence Query Language) or a Criteria API query.
That is why this book is focused on how Hibernate manages to implement both the JPA specification and its non-standard native features (that are relevant from an efficiency perspective).
Because of data representation duality, there has been a rivalry between taking ownership of the underlying schema. Although theoretically, both the database and the Domain Model could drive the schema evolution, for practical reasons, the schema belongs to the database.
An enterprise system might be too large to fit into a single application, so it is not uncommon to split in into multiple subsystems, each one serving a specific goal. As an example, there can be front-end web applications, integration web services, email schedulers, full-text search engines and back-end batch processors that need to load data into the system. All these subsystems need to use the underlying database, whether it is for displaying content to the users or dumping data into the system.
Although it might not fit any enterprise system, having the database as a central integration point can still be a choice for many reasonable size enterprise systems.
The relational database concurrency models offer strong consistency guarantees, therefore having a significant advantage to application development. If the integration point does not provide transactional semantics, it will be much more difficult to implement a distributed concurrency control mechanism.
Most database systems already offer support for various replication topologies, which can provide more capacity for accommodating an increase in the incoming request traffic. Even if the demand for more data continues to grow, the hardware is always getting better and better (and cheaper too), and database vendors keep on improving their engines to cope with more data.
For these reasons, having the database as an integration point is still a relevant enterprise system design consideration.
No matter what architecture style is chosen, there is still need to correlate the transient Domain Model with the underlying persistent data.
The data schema evolves along the enterprise system itself, and so the two different schema representations must remain congruent at all times.
Even if the data access framework can auto-generate the database schema, the schema must be migrated incrementally, and all changes need to be traceable in the VCS (Version Control System) as well. Along with table structure, indexes and triggers, the database schema is, therefore, accompanying the Domain Model source code itself. A tool like Flywaydb can automate the database schema migration, and the system can be deployed continuously, whether it is a test or a production environment.
JPA shifts the developer mindset from SQL statements to entity state transitions. An entity can be in one of the following states:
|New (Transient)||A newly created entity which is not mapped to any database row is considered to be in the New or Transient state. Once it becomes managed, the Persistence Context issues an insert statement at flush time.|
|Managed (Persistent)||A Persistent entity is associated with a database row, and it is being managed by the currently running Persistence Context. State changes are detected by the dirty checking mechanism and propagated to the database as update statements at flush time.|
|Detached||Once the currently running Persistence Context is closed, all the previously managed entities become detached. Successive changes are no longer tracked, and no automatic database synchronization is going to happen.|
|Removed||A removed entity is only scheduled for deletion, and the actual database delete statement is executed during Persistence Context flushing.|
The Persistence Context captures entity state changes, and, during flushing, it translates them into SQL statements.
EntityManager and the Hibernate
Session (which includes additional methods for moving an entity from one state to the other) interfaces are gateways towards the underlying Persistence Context,
and they define all the entity state transition operations.
Following the SQL standard, the JDBC
ResultSet is a tabular representation of the underlying fetched data.
The Domain Model being constructed as an entity graph, the data access layer must transform the flat
ResultSet into a hierarchical structure.
Although the goal of the ORM tool is to reduce the gap between the object-oriented Domain Model and its relational counterpart, it is very important to remember that the source of data is not an in-memory repository, and the fetching behavior influences the overall data access efficiency.
In the following example, the posts records are fetched along with all their associated comments. Using JDBC, this task can be accomplished using the following code snippet:
When joining many-to-one or one-to-one associations, each
ResultSet record corresponds to a pair of entities, so both the parent and the child can be resolved in each iteration.
For one-to-many or many-to-many relationships, because of how the SQL join works, the
ResultSet contains a duplicated parent record for each associated child.
Constructing the hierarchical entity structure requires manual
ResultSet transformation, and, to resolve duplicates, the parent entity references are stored in a
The JDBC 4.2
PreparedStatement supports only positional parameters, and the first ordinal starts from 1.
JPA allows named parameters as well, which are especially useful when a parameter needs to be referenced multiple times, so the previous example can be rewritten as follows:
In both examples, the object-relation transformation takes place either implicitly or explicitly. In the JDBC use case, the associations must be manually resolved, while JPA does it automatically (based on the entity schema).
Bridging two highly-specific technologies is always a difficult problem to solve. When the enterprise system is built on top of an object-oriented language, the object-relational impedance mismatch becomes inevitable. The ORM pattern aims to close this gap although it cannot completely abstract it out.
In the end, all the communication flows through JDBC and every execution happens in the database engine itself. A high-performance enterprise application must resonate with the underlying database system, and the ORM tool must not disrupt this relationship.
Just like the problem it tries to solve, Hibernate is a very complex framework with many subtleties that require a thorough knowledge of both database systems, JDBC, and the framework itself. This chapter is only a summary, meant to present JPA and Hibernate into a different perspective that prepares the reader for high-performance object-relational mapping. There is no need to worry if some topics are not entirely clear because the upcoming chapters analyze all these concepts in greater detail.
When working with a relational database, it all boils down to SQL statements.
As previously explained, Hibernate entity queries are suitable for read-write logical transactions. For reporting, analytics or ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) native SQL queries are the best choice since they can take advantage of database-specific features like window functions or Common Table Expressions. Even for CRUD operations, there might be times when a database-specific syntax is more suitable like it’s the case for the upsert SQL operation.
While Hibernate does a very good job to automate the vast majority of statements, it is unlikely that you can rely on Hibernate alone for every business use case. Therefore, native queries are a necessity for most enterprise applications.
As demonstrated in the Native query DTO projection section, both JPA and Hibernate provide a way to execute native SQL statements. Being able to execute any SQL statement is great, but, unfortunately, the JPA approach is limited to static statements only. To build native SQL statement dynamically, JPA and Hibernate are no longer enough.
JOOQ is a query builder framework that allows you generate a great variety of database-specific statements using a Java API.
DSLContext is the starting point to building any SQL statement, and it requires two things:
- a reference to a JDBC
- a database dialect so that it can translate the Java API query representation into a database-specific SQL query
For instance, when using PostgreSQL 9.5, the
DSLContext can be constructed as follows:
DSLContext in place, it’s time to show some simple DML statements like insert, update, delete, as well as a trivial select query.
What’s worth noticing is that the Java API syntax is almost identical to its SQL counterpart, so most jOOQ queries are self-describing.
To delete all records for the
post table, the following jOOQ statement must be used:
Which translates to the following SQL statement:
To insert a new
post table row, the following jOOQ statement can be used:
Just like in JDBC, the
execute method return the affected row count for the current
delete SQL statement.
When running the previous jOOQ query, the following SQL statement is being executed:
When updating the previously inserted record:
JOOQ generates the following SQL statement:
Selecting the previously updated record is just as easy:
To execute the statement and return the SQL query result set, the
fetch method must be used.
As expected, the previous jOOQ query generates the following SQL statement:
All the previous queries were referencing the database schema explicitly, like the table name or the table columns. However, just like JPA defines a Metamodel API for Criteria queries, jOOQ allows generating a Java-based schema that mirrors the one in the database.
There are many advantages to having access to the underlying database schema right from the Java data access layer. For instance, when executing a database stored procedure, the argument types can be bound at compile-time. The same argument holds for query parameters or the result set obtained from running a particular query.
When a column name needs to be modified, there is no risk of forgetting to update a given jOOQ statement because a Java-based schema violation will prevent the application from compiling properly. From a development perspective, the Java-based schema enables the IDE to autocomplete jOOQ queries, therefore increasing productivity and reducing the likelihood of typos.
After generating the Java-based schema, the application developer can use it to build any type-safe jOOQ query.
To rewrite the previous DML statements to use the Java-based schema, the generated schema classes need to be imported first:
With the Java-based schema in place, the previous DML statements become even more descriptive:
In database terminology, an
upsert statement is a mix between an insert and an update statement.
First, the insert statement is executed and if it succeeds, the operation return successfully.
If the insert fails, it means that there is already a database row matching the same unique constraints with the insert statement.
In this case, an update is issued against the database row that matches the given filtering criteria.
The SQL:2003 and SQL:2008 standards define the
MERGE statement, which among other scenarios, it can be used to emulate the upsert operation.
MERGE acts more like an if-then-else statement, therefore being possible to combine insert, update, and delete statements.
While upsert implies the same database table,
MERGE can also be used to synchronize the content of two different tables.
Oracle and SQL Server implement the
MERGE operation according to the standard specification, whereas
MySQL and PostgreSQL provide only an implementation for the upsert operation.
JOOQ implements the upsert operation, therefore, managing to translate the Java-based query to the underlying database-specific SQL syntax.
To visualize how upsert works, consider the following method which aims to insert a
post_details record if there is none,
or to update the existing record if there is already a row with the same primary key:
Two users, Alice and Bob, are going to execute the
upsertPostDetails method concomitantly,
and, because of the upsert logic, the first user is going to insert the record while the second one is going to update it, without throwing any exception:
JOOQ is going to translate the upsert Java-based operation to the specific syntax employed by the underlying relational database.
On Oracle, jOOQ uses the
MERGE statement to implement the upsert logic:
Just like with Oracle, jOOQ uses
MERGE to implement the upsert operation on SQL Server:
As opposed to Oracle and SQL Server, PostgreSQL offers the
ON CONFLICT clause, which jOOQ uses for implementing upsert:
Almost identical to PostgreSQL, MySQL uses the
ON DUPLICATE KEY for upsert:
As previously explained, JDBC batching plays a very important role in tuning the data access layer write operation performance. While Hibernate offers automated JDBC batching, for entities using identity columns, insert statements do not benefit from this feature. This is because Hibernate requires the entity identifier upon persisting the entity, and the only way to know the identity column value is to execute the insert statement.
Instead of implementing an automatic entity state management mechanism like Hibernate, jOOQ takes a WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) approach to persistence.
Even if nowadays many relational database systems offer sequences (Oracle, SQL Server 2012, PostgreSQL, MariaDB), the identity generator is still the only viable option for MySQL (e.g.
However, since MySQL has a very significant market share, it is important to know that, with jOOQ, JDBC batching works just fine with insert statements.
To batch the insert statements associated to three
Post entries, jOOQ offers the following API:
Running this test case on MySQL, jOOQ generates the following output:
As illustrated, jOOQ manages to batch all inserts in a single database roundtrip.
By default, just like Hibernate, jOOQ uses
PreparedStatement(s) and bind parameter values.
This is a very good default strategy since prepared statements can benefit from statement caching, as previously explained.
However, every rule has an exception. Because the bind parameter values might influence the execution plan, reusing a cached plan might be suboptimal in certain scenarios. Some database systems use statistics to monitor the efficiency of a cached execution plan, but the automatic adjustment process might take time.
For this reason, it is not uncommon to want to bypass the execution plan cache for certain queries that take skewed bind parameter values. Because the query string forms the cache key, by inlining the bind parameter values into the SQL statement, it is for sure that the database will either generate a new plan or pick the cached execution plan that was generated for the very same SQL statement.
This workaround can address the issue when bind parameter values are skewed, but it requires building the SQL statement dynamically. The worst thing to do would be to start concatenating string fragments and risk SQL injection attacks. Fortunately, jOOQ offers a way to inline the bind parameters right into the SQL statements without exposing the data access layer to SQL injection vulnerabilities. The jOOQ API ensures the bind parameter values match the expected bind parameter types.
Because by default jOOQ relies on
PreparedStatement(s), to switch to using an inlined
Statement, it is required to provide the following setting upon creating the
Afterward, when executing a parameterized query:
JOOQ is going to inline all bind parameter values into the SQL statement
Without supplying the
StatementType.STATIC_STATEMENT setting, when using datasource-proxy to intercept the executed SQL statement,
the actual executed statement looks as follows:
In the Native query DTO projection section, there was an SQL query using Window Functions, Derived Tables, and Recursive CTE (Common Table Expressions). Not only that it’s possible to rewrite the whole query in Java, but that can be done programmatically.
postCommentScores method shows how Derived Tables and Window Functions work with jOOQ.
In fact, the jOOQ API resembles almost identically the actual SQL statement.
Because following a very large query is sometimes difficult, with jOOQ, it’s fairly easy to break a query into multiple building blocks.
In this particular example, the
WITH RECURSIVE query is encapsulated in its own method.
Aside from readability, it is possible to reuse the
withRecursiveExpression query method for other use cases, therefore reducing the likelihood of code duplication.
To fetch the list of
PostCommentScore entries, the application developer just has to call the
However, the application requires the
PostCommentScore entries to be arranged in a tree-like structure based on the
This was also the case with Hibernate, and that was the reason for providing a custom
PostCommentScoreRootTransformer is added for the jOOQ query as well.
PostCommentScoreRootTransformer class is almost identical to the
PostCommentScoreResultTransformer used in the Hibernate Fetching chapter.
When it comes to calling stored procedures or user-defined database functions, jOOQ is probably the best tool for this job. Just like it scans the database metadata and builds a Java-based schema, jOOQ is capable of generating Java-based stored procedures as well.
For example, the previous query can be encapsulated in a stored procedure which takes the
postId and the
rankId and returns a
REFCURSOR which can be used to fetch the list of
When the Java-based schema was generated, jOOQ has created a
PostCommentScore class for the
post_comment_scores PostgreSQL function.
PostCommentScore jOOQ utility offers a very trivial API, so calling the
post_comment_scores function is done like this:
When processing large result sets, it’s a good idea to split the whole data set into multiple subsets that can be processed in batches. This way, the memory is better allocated among multiple running threads of execution.
One way to accomplish this task is to split the data set at the SQL level, as explained in the DTO projection pagination section. Streaming is another way of controlling the fetched result set size, and jOOQ makes it very easy to operate on database cursors.
To demonstrate how streaming works, let’s consider a forum application which allows only one account for every given user. A fraud detection mechanism must be implemented to uncover users operating on multiple accounts.
To identify a user logins, the IP address must be stored in the database. However, the IP alone is not sufficient since multiple users belonging to the same private network might share the same public IP. For this reason, the application requires additional information to identify each particular user. Luckily, the browser sends all sorts of HTTP headers which can be combined and hashed into a user fingerprint. To make the fingerprint as effective as possible, the application must use the following HTTP headers: User Agent, Content Encoding, Platform, Timezone, Screen Resolution, Language, List of Fonts, etc.
ip and the
fingerprint are going to be stored in a
Every time a
post_comment is being added, a new
post_comment_details is going to be inserted as well.
Because of the one-to-one relationship, the
post_comment and the ``post_comment_details` tables can share the same Primary Key.
The fraud detection batch process runs periodically and validates the latest added
Because there can be many records to be scanned, a database cursor is used.
JOOQ offers a Java 8 stream API for navigating the underlying database cursor, therefore, the batch process job can be implemented as follows:
Because there can be thousands of posts added in a day, when processing the stream, a fixed-size
HashMap is used to prevent the application from running out of memory.
To solve this issue, a custom-made
MaxSizeHashMap can be used so that it provides a FIFO (first-in, first-out) data structure to hold the current processing data window.
MaxSizeHashMap is pretty straight forward since
java.util.LinkedHashMap offers a
removeEldestEntry extension callback which gets called whenever a new element is being added to the
IpFingerprint class is used for associating multiple user ids to a specific IP and fingerprint.
IpFingerprint object is used as a
Map key, the
hashCode methods must be implemented so that they use the associated IP and fingerprint.
With these utilities in place, the
processStream must create a tree structure that can be navigated as follows:
IpFingerprint -> list of
processStream method iterates the underlying database cursor and builds a
Map where the key is the
post_id and the value is a
Map of fingerprints and user ids.
user_id list contains more than one entry, it means there have been multiple users identified by the same fingerprint, therefore, a notification must be sent to the system administrator.
As explained in the DTO projection pagination section, pagination can improve performance since the application only fetches as much data as it’s required to be rendered by the current view. The default pagination technique supported by JPA and Hibernate is called the offset method, and it is efficient only for small result sets or when navigating the first pages of a large result set. The further the page, the more work is going to be done by the database to fetch the current subset of data. To overcome the offset pagination limitation, the application developer has two alternatives.
The first choice is to narrow down the result set as much as possible using multiple filtering criteria. From a user experience perspective, this is probably the best option as well since the user can select the exact subset of data that she is interested in operating. If the filtered subset is rather small, the offset pagination limitation is not going to be a big issue.
However, if the filtered subset is still large and there is no more filtering that can be further applied, then keyset pagination becomes a better alternative to using the SQL-level offset support. Keyset pagination uses the database table primary key to mark the position of the current fetching data subset.
If JPA 2.1 and Hibernate 5.2 do not offer support for keyset pagination, jOOQ provides a
seek() method which translates to a database-specific keyset pagination query syntax.
Considering the front page of a forum application which displays all the posts in the descending order of their creation,
the application requires a paginated view over the following
The keyset pagination query is rather trivial as illustrated by the following code snippet:
To fetch the first page, the offset
When fetching the first page on PostgreSQL, jOOQ executes the following SQL query:
After fetching a page of results, the last entry becomes the offset
PostSummary for the next page:
When fetching the second page on PostgreSQL, jOOQ executes the following query:
On Oracle 11g, jOOQ uses the following SQL query:
Because Oracle 11g does not support comparison with row value expressions as well a dedicated SQL operator for limiting the result set, jOOQ must emulate the same behavior, hence the SQL query is more complex than the one executed on PostgreSQL.